The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talkabout my edits? 13:48, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ma Liuming (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Is this artist sufficiently notable? From an outsider's view, I don't think so, but further thoughts are requested. Delete. --Nlu (talk) 18:47, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:46, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:46, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:46, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, Some notable museum/Biennale survey exhibition inclusion, mostly independently curated, plus after digging i found an in depth review from the senior art critic at the NYT about the artwork http://www.nytimes.com/1999/03/05/arts/art-in-review-ma-liuming.html,))Euartcurator (talk) 10:53, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talkabout my edits? 13:10, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.