- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:29, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Maksud Agadjani (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non notable promotional article. It doesn't seem to meet WP:GNG. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 14:18, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Businesspeople, Business, and Azerbaijan. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 14:19, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom, and per absence of reliable sources. BD2412 T 14:48, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Oh dear. Hard delete. Mccapra (talk) 18:53, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fashion, Internet, and New York. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:10, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete wildly promotional and does not pass WP:GNG. Best, GPL93 (talk) 14:12, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete not notable and promotional content.Sideriver84 (talk)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.