The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Malik Deenar. Consensus is that the article should not exist; across the two AfDs, there is a weak consensus that some material from the article should be merged into Malik Deenar. ItsZippy (talkcontributions) 21:13, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Malik Deenar Uroos (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The reasons for this second nomination are the same as the reasons for the first. There is only one reason why this article wasn't deleted before, and that's because only one other editor responded and no consensus was found. This article obviously fails notability guidelines, as will be clear if only more editors would take interest in the discussion. MezzoMezzo (talk) 05:09, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. MezzoMezzo (talk) 05:12, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. MezzoMezzo (talk) 05:12, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. MezzoMezzo (talk) 05:12, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 01:06, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.