The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) SMB9 9thx my edits 03:37, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Manchurian nationalism

[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

seems to be some kind of WP:POVFORK and a smattering of information from pages like Manchu people. The article itself even conceeds that " historian David Egler to describe Manchurian nationalism as "artificial"." Prisencolin (talk) 17:58, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2020 October 23. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 18:18, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:26, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 18:44, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:47, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Keep according to what you're insisting as POV, actually I didn't see this look like the WP;POV became this is ethnic nationalism. There is many difference in the both two article and not that in the sources provided there indicate it significance or not notable. So no merge or delete, just keep. Mr-5 / (M 📩 ✉ / C🖋 ) 08:00, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep How is this POV if the article evenly presents the different viewpoints on the topic? I also do not understand how it can be a fork, as this article adresses not just Manchu but also Han Chinese and Japanese points of view. In addition, the article is notable as the topic - Manchurian nationalism - was actually a major political topic from the 1910s to the 1930s, despite the fact that it was largely engineered (one could contend that all forms of nationalism are partially or completely engineered, anyway). Applodion (talk) 12:07, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep In my opinion the article is not POV, there are several views presented. It's referenced enough to pass WP:GNG and has over 720 hits in the last month - enough for such a topic. Less Unless (talk) 17:48, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep topic is notable Spudlace (talk) 04:29, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep passes WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 06:43, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.