The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Christian Action Network. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 01:30, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Martin Mawyer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not-notable chairperson. Fails WP:GNG. Night of the Big Wind talk 19:02, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree. He is a major activist leader whose campaigns have received nationwide attention. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.121.6.52 (talk) 19:30, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If he is so important, why does he score only 25.000 internet hits and 0 (zero) on Google News? And sorry, I can not see Fox News and their own website as reliable third party sources. Night of the Big Wind talk 19:56, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I get 274 hits by clicking on the Google News link provided above. You seem to be looking only at the recent hits, rather than the archive. Phil Bridger (talk) 19:23, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Logan Talk Contributions 21:33, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Logan Talk Contributions 21:33, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails WP:GNG; lack of significant secondary coverage. AV3000 (talk) 04:37, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ankit Maity Talkcontribs 16:39, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, v/r - TP 22:01, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.