The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Due to the number of policies being breached including A10 from the unsourced seemingly POV claims the article and author make, this article will be speedily deleted. Mkdw ^talk 13:42, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Max Blumenthal Elie Wiesel Affair

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Event fails WP:NTEMP and WP:SUSTAINED. Article is about events surrounding the comments made by a reporter, but not notable enough to warrant its own article. –Dream out loud (talk) 22:38, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Violation of WP:ARBPIA3#500/30, should be speedy deleted. nableezy - 23:01, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as unnecessary, and cover the material in Max Blumenthal. (I don't think this article is within the scope of the 500/30 rule that Nableezy cites, however.) Newyorkbrad (talk) 00:31, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:37, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:37, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete for so many reasons, including WP:A1, WP:A10, and WP:G10. Also WP:NOTNEWS, WP:UNDUE, and unsourced WP:BLP-violating analysis. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 03:47, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.