The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. WP:SNOW. In defense of the nominator, this is what the article looked like when they nommed it. WP:HEY credit to Vinegarymass911. (non-admin closure) Curbon7 (talk) 14:07, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Md. Shah Newaz Chowdhury[edit]

Md. Shah Newaz Chowdhury (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:GNG and there's next to no content in the article. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:26, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Bangladesh. Shellwood (talk) 22:11, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  Delete due to no claim of notability. CT55555 (talk) 22:33, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  How is being a member of parliament not a claim of notability? Phil Bridger (talk) 08:32, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per the first point of WP:NPOL, members of national parliament are presumed notable.Vinegarymass911 (talk) 02:54, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Vinegarymass911. —Yahya (talk • contribs.) 09:32, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:49, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.