The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Michaelzeng7 (talk) 01:49, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Mekaela Academies

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Originally speedied as spam, but the creator reinstated it. The only citation is a WP:SPS, and there are no independent third party sources I could find about this organisation, which would suggest that it may not satisfy WP:GNG. Ohc ^¡digame!_{¿que pasa?} 18:34, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Kenya-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:40, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:40, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:41, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I tried searching on the 4 school names, including within the .ke domain, and found very little sourcing that would apply to WP:GNG (for a summary of the rule see WP:42) . -- Green Cardamom (talk) 06:39, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I understand your worries about promotional articles but Mekaela Academies do exist and there are sources which mention the schools (2 German newspapers, 2 Kenyan newspapers, Lufthansa's HelpAlliance and One-World-Foundation, to name but a few. I don't understand why those sources shouldn't be reliable enough. Stefan (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 08:33, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Can you link to sources? -- Green Cardamom (talk) 15:36, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, I will update the links to newspaper articles and websites which mention Mekaela Academies Stefan (talk) 8:34, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

I added a few external links which refer to the project. If that can't help preventing the deletion of my article I rest my case. Stefan (talk) 7:51, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

Weak keep There are three independent reliable sources that discuss Mekaela Academies.[1][2][3] There may be more as SW2001E mentioned something about "2 Kenyan newspapers". -- Green Cardamom (talk) 15:30, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 19:03, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - in the US the norm is for primary schools to be municipally funded through school districts. There are exceptions, private schools, church schools etc. but I think it's fair to say that this is the norm. School districts are invariably considered notable. The reason being not only because of their community importance but because they provide a convenient repository for information about nn primary schools. In a developing country different considerations apply. Very often charities or private companies organise their schools. To avoid systemic bias I see no reason why these groupings should be treated differently from school districts. Moving on to sources, many of these countries have a poor Internet presence for educational groupings. So, time should be allowed for hard-copy sources to be researched. In the case of Mekaela Academies all the indications are, given time it can be developed to meet WP:ORG - therefore 'Keep'. The Whispering Wind (talk) 00:49, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It's a group of schools, one of which is a high school. It should be treated as in some respects a combination article for a school system, not as individual primary schools. DGG ( talk ) 00:01, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.