The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MelanieN (talk) 18:52, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Melrose Kai-Banya[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:BIO. Ambassadors are not inherently notable. And simply being ambassador to Russia does not grant automatic notability especially when there is no evidence of any work in the role. The small amount of hits are just 1 line mentions. LibStar (talk) 16:03, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – no significance. sst✈ 16:14, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. sst✈ 16:14, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti ^Talk 16:12, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. —UY Scuti ^Talk 16:12, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 16:36, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 16:36, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Not enough significant coverage in independent reliable sources to pass WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:55, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.