The result was speedy delete for all the reasons listed below — Preceding unsigned comment added by The Anome (talk • contribs) 00:18, 12 September 2011
Whether it's original research/synthesis or complete nonsense is difficult to tell: it's so poorly written it's impossible to guess what a metadefinition is from it. The term is at best a dictionary definition, though more likely a neologism: a Google search turns up precisely one page, this one; a scholar search a handful of results, in each of which it seems to be defined anew each time. JohnBlackburnewordsdeeds 13:03, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]