The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:02, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mi-case (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Almost no content, reliable sources, or anything for that matter. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 14:15, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Would qualify for A7 CSD easily on the lack of notability. Unfortunately it is outside the subject scope of A7. So here we are. - TexasAndroid (talk) 15:01, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 15:01, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete-- per above. --E♴ (talk) 15:14, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy delete per WP:SNOW. It's not notable. One could also argue for G11, as I don't see any other reason for creating this article other than to promote the subject. --Pontificalibus (talk) 16:23, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - If this was supposed to be spam, they did a very bad job of it. Article is almost content free. No coverage in reliable sources. -- Whpq (talk) 15:00, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Not notable Superman7515 (talk) 00:29, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.