The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 12:08, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Midnight Watchmen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GROUP. No reliable sources to demonstrate non-trivial coverage Goodvac (talk) 22:56, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

How is two (2) direct newspaper articles/web links not reliable sources?? Johnthewatchman (talk) 23:32, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"Midnight Watchmen" doesn't even appear in [1]. Goodvac (talk) 01:37, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Though they do appear in the DVD you are correct that they are not listed in the link. I will correct that. I still say that ur above statement of sources are in accruate sounds as if all the sources credited are wrong, when its just one that needed to be corrected. Johnthewatchman (talk) 01:41, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Both [2] and [3] are published by Bucks County Courier Times, which is based in Bucks County, Pennsylvania. Bucks County is the setting of the news report, which thus constitutes local coverage. Is there any wider coverage of Midnight Watchment? Goodvac (talk) 01:59, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Simply put because the articles were also published online which means its global as well, in your thought process. As they are accessible anywhere in the world to read. Johnthewatchman (talk) 02:27, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Just because it was published online doesn't mean that it is not a local source. There are no sources from elsewhere—outside of Buck County. The fact that no other sources exist means that this group is merely of local interest: "Evidence of attention by international or national, or at least regional, media is a strong indication of notability. On the other hand, attention solely from local media, or media of limited interest and circulation, is not an indication of notability." Thus, Midnight Watchmen does not meet WP:GROUP. Goodvac (talk) 07:07, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete trivial coverage doesn't meet requirements of WP:ORG. - LuckyLouie (talk) 20:13, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:45, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:45, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - coverage is local only -- Whpq (talk) 21:24, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.