- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle (talk) 03:34, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Miss Earth Uganda (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:ORGIN and does not qualify for GNG via WP:INHERITORG. Over 12 Miss Earth country articles have been AfD deleted or deleted for being created by sockpuppets that built a lot of this fancruft. Legacypac (talk) 09:34, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep The article is notable and passed WP:GNG and WP:NEVENT. The The National Forestry Authority (NFA) of Uganda in conjunction with Uganda's National Environmental Management Authority (Nema) is the organizer of the national beauty pageant, Miss Earth Uganda according to this source. There are many acceptable sources from news agencies in Uganda and Africa for this article:
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. North America1000 01:44, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Uganda-related deletion discussions. North America1000 01:44, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. North America1000 01:45, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:24, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete At present, the sources available have either nothing to do with a subject or are related sources. The pageant started only in 2015, so the three other pageants just drop out of the sky. No evidence that this preliminary round is important enough. The Banner talk 04:33, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep All: I believe the article passed the notability guidelines. If there are some issues with the content, a revision is a much better solution than deleting the whole article. Artchino (talk) 15:17, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.