The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Miss Gabon. No merge appears to be necessary as the only data listed for each year is the winner, which is already listed in the main article. —Darkwind (talk) 02:31, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Miss Gabon 2014 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable year version of a just twothree year old pageant. Fails WP:GNG The Banner talk 20:04, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:57, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:57, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Wrong again, The Banner, both times. First: I'm not following you around, I'm scrutinizing AfD every day, and !vote at, or relist, all discussions where I feel I can contribute something helpful. Second: The introduction of this article says"...was be the 3rd Miss Gabon pageant by the Committee "Défis de femmes" (Women's Challenges)..." That means it was the 3rd pageant organized by a certain organization, that means the previous twelve editions were organized by somebody else, but not that the pageant is "three years old'". One click on Miss Gabon would give the correct info. AfD nominators are supposed to check WP:BEFORE they nominate something. Kraxler (talk) 23:33, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 02:17, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 02:17, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.