The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:13, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mission of the International Organisation for Migration, London

[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No secondary sources. Sole source is government list. Article on an individual office of the IOM which simply states it exists and its location. Fails WP:ORGCRIT and WP:GNG. Nothing to merge and an implausible search term. AusLondonder (talk) 00:06, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations, Organizations, and United Kingdom. AusLondonder (talk) 00:06, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I don't think this is a good merge candidate because there's not even enough information to work out if any of the content is even still true. It does seem to still exist from a Google search, but it's certainly not notable outside of its parent article. Redirect not especially good idea other as is not a likely redirect BrigadierG (talk) 01:37, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nominator rationale. Local units of larger organizations are not notable unless there are substantial reliable source coverage of it. Dclemens1971 (talk) 01:39, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails GNG and WP:ORG. LibStar (talk) 04:09, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to International Organization for Migration as WP:ATD. There are 195 incoming links to this page and although most are likely from ((Diplomatic missions in the United Kingdom)) it is WP:CHEAPER to redirect than to identify and adjust the links. ~Kvng (talk) 15:49, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose a redirect, this is an utterly implausible search term. ATD doesn't mean we can literally never delete anything nor does it eliminate other parts of the deletion policy such as WP:DEL-REASON: see #8 "Articles whose subjects fail to meet the relevant notability guideline (WP:N, WP:GNG, WP:BIO, WP:MUSIC, WP:CORP, and so forth)" are suitable for deletion. Incoming links appear to be from the template. A redirect is also undue as this office is not mentioned at International Organization for Migration (nor should it be). AusLondonder (talk) 15:59, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Agree with above, I oppose redirect too. LibStar (talk) 23:19, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.