The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. No deletion rationale provided with this deletion nomination. If you renominate this article in the future (not now), please provide a policy-based deletion rationale. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:02, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Modern Chinese characters (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I think this article should be deleted, with its content merged into Chinese characters. A redirect might be appropriate as an alternative? GnocchiFan (talk) 10:30, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• While merging might be appropriate, this article has been discussed and AFD closed as keep just two weeks ago. It is not appropriate to renominate it so soon. Suggest withdrawal and speedy closure. —Kusma (talk) 10:49, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Language and China. Shellwood (talk) 11:50, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - 1: This article is encyclopaedic, notable and superbly sourced. There is zero reason to delete it. 2: It is inappropriate to re-nom this so quickly. That alone would warrant a Keep !vote. Cheers, Last1in (talk) 14:52, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Keep per the others, but also re-nominating so soon seems unnecessary. Unless several of the articles proved to be false then that could have been good rationale, but otherwise this is inappropriate. Conyo14 (talk) 21:20, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Do not delete. No rationale provided by nom; previous AfD closed only two weeks ago. (Disclosure: I participated there. Not sure if I'm allowed to comment here or not.) Folly Mox (talk) 16:18, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment I just closed the first AFD on this article on two weeks ago. Generally, editors wait a few months before renominating. Is there a reason for your urgency about this article? Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:56, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.