The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 14:09, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mohanan Vaidyar[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

pseudo-medicine practitioner who fails GNG MistyGraceWhite (talk) 12:10, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:42, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:42, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not notable as an academic and fails our guidelines on articles on fringe people.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:08, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Thebiv19 (talk) 20:07, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. Thebiv19 (talk) 20:07, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Lack of significant coverage by relevant sources of the field. Article might be created in future but should be written without BLP violations. Srijanx22 (talk) 06:55, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.