The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 07:17, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.

However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.

Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: ((subst:spa|username)); suspected canvassed users: ((subst:canvassed|username)); accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: ((subst:csm|username)) or ((subst:csp|username)).

MooMoo.io[edit]

(Find video game sources: "MooMoo.io" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk)

Prod removed with no reason given by article creator. The article fails WP:GNG with no mentions in reliable sources. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 14:20, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. FITINDIA 14:32, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. FITINDIA 14:32, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. FITINDIA 14:32, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Its a notable video game with more than 6000 players active daily. The wikipedia has many stub articles, then why delete this, beside, what source. This isn't a history article is it. Its a game and I did give the links so it is a game and not just a lie article made by me. Please do not delete this article. Hagoromo's Susanoo (talk) 04:32, 14 August 2017 (UTC)Hagoromo's SusanooHagoromo's Susanoo (talk) 04:32, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What you are arguing is basically original research, which is not allowed on Wikipedia, otherwise everyone could just start making articles with the claim "this is notable, I swear!". Your other arguments are it's popular and other stuff exists which are also not legitimate arguments. If the article is as notable as you claim then all you have to do is wait for other editors to back you up, otherwise you're probably doing something wrong and should read general notability guideline. By saying "please do not delete" you are also not assuming good faith that I am somehow out to delete your article in particular and not anything that is non-notable._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 12:55, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please, I dont even know how this good faith came. I just want this article to stay here; Im not being rude, just polietely asking that do not delete this article, don't take it personally like I'm saying anything against you; I'm not. This is not bad faith, I just misunderstood what you were trying to say. Trust me, I'm a very polite person. Read this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Assume_the_assumption_of_good_faith#What_.22Bad_Faith.22_Is_NOT P.S: I did ask help from the admins of MooMoo.io discord, I hope they'll do something. "Please do not delete" is just a request from me that discuss with me about this article rather than delete it immediately(some other artcils of mine were speedily deleted, without giving me a speaking chance). Hagoromo's Susanoo (talk) 12:33, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Assuming bad faith does not mean being impolite, it means thinking that other editors are trying to sabotage you for unjust reasons. As if asking me not to delete would somehow make the big bad editor stand down. I am not an admin so I wouldn't actually be deleting anything, I am just pointing out the article for being non-notable, which is something that is governed by a very public set of rules that anyone can read indepth._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 13:18, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I know, either I was assuming that you are sabotaging me, I probably phased it incorrect, I just meant that discuss with me before deleting it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hagoromo's Susanoo (talk • contribs) 15:39, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I did a quick search and found this not particularly great source here. There are some additional sources in Spanish but I'm not familar enough with the language to review them - they might help but based on the website names they don't look promising. Also, the game's number of players does not make the game notable and I suggest the article creator read WP:Other stuff exists. ZettaComposer (talk) 13:37, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Cannot find multiple reliable independent in-depth sources, such as WP:VG/RS, to satisfy WP:GNG. Daily Game does not appear reliable. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 22:00, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A game with 6000+ players daily isn't notable, we do have unimportant stubs on wikipedia, don't we? Besides the source you gave me is in English not Spanish. Or then tell me, how many players should it have to be notable? It has a google app, major gaming websites have it, whats more needed? ^[1] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hagoromo's Susanoo (talk • contribs)

References

^ https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.yendis.moomoo_mobile&hl=en

It should be covered in-depth by multiple reliable independent sources. Read what WP:GNG actually says. Without sources, we would have to write content ourselves, which is directly against Wikipedia's core policy of WP:V. Zxcvbnm already addressed using the notion of being popular or there being other games as unsuitable arguments against deletion. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 12:36, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. As established, not notable game. No in-depth coverage by reliable sources. @Hagoromo's Susanoo, might I suggest you take a moment to read WP:N and WP:NGAMES? It would be a waste of your time and energy to spend time arguing this. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 11:20, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:GNG. Topic lacks significant coverage from reliable secondary source. A reliable video game source web search returns 0 results. --The1337gamer (talk) 16:28, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per above comments. Does not appear to meet the WP:GNG. Number of active players usually doesn't factor in to notability. (And even if it did, I'm not sure 6,000 is particularly noteworthy or impressive anyways.) Sergecross73 msg me 14:52, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.