The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Big Dom 08:57, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Moorside hotel

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Hotel, written up in spammy tone with no evidence of notability. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 12:58, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Blatant and spammy advertisement, full of phrases copied from the hotel's website. Not one guidebook or newspaper article is cited to support the numerous peacock claims. Edison (talk) 15:41, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Spam. Ka Faraq Gatri (talk) 18:08, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 23:29, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 23:29, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as obvious advert. Should an evidence of notability be found, you'd have to delete the whole article and start again anyway. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 11:26, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non-notable. On a side note, I had to remove a lot of text that was close-paraphrased and took out a lot of promotional text as well that was intertwined.--NortyNort (Holla) 05:04, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.