The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Jake Wartenberg 23:15, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mr Gorgeous

[edit]
Mr Gorgeous (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Even though having being charted may qualify, does that mean charted as high as "472" qualifies for WP:MUSIC. My nomination based on the line at the end of the introduction line: "failed to enter the UK charts".

I recommend merging those listed below to the Clea (band) article for the same reason above:

LoveShy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Emma Beard (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Aimee Kearsley (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Donnie Park (talk) 14:55, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - The singles chart in the United Kingdom only goes up to 200. So I'd love to know where the "472" came from. DitzyNizzy (aka Jess)|(talk to me)|(What I've done) 19:21, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:07, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | Talk 00:10, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.