The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete the one with the error in the title and keep the other. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:26, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ms. G.O.A.T (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Recreation of deleted topic Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ms. G.O.A.T., still a non-notable mixtape with no reliable sources Delete Secret ^account 15:50, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as article fails notability criteria for albums. One source is not enough. Armbrust ^Talk _Contribs 00:21, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:03, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - there are enough sources, in my opinion, to keep this article. Amazon - hiphopmusicdotcom - MTV - vh1 - All Hip Hop: Review, granted the vh1 source and other sources then these appear to be simply tracklisting, but with it's coverage, sig. standard release/track information, reviews and album cover, this seems completely legitimate for a keep. With input in support, I will make the necessary additions to the article. - Theornamentalist (talk) 03:41, 12 September 2010 (UTC) see the comments below. - Theornamentalist (talk) 22:11, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - redid it in proper spot - Ms. G.O.A.T. - Theornamentalist (talk) 17:02, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    • Comment I apologize for the confusion and complication in this AfD, I rebuilt the album at the correct spot above, which I suppose should, to remain proper in the process, receive the AfD tag on it. Regarding the article that is currently listed by Secret account, with the improper naming, I would propose, because of my article creation in the correct spot, a Speedy Deletion of Ms. G.O.A.T - Theornamentalist (talk) 21:54, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • One is a blog, two just offerers the CD for sale (VH1 and Amazon) and not considered a source, and another source allhiphop I know the owners who does the website (I work for an hip-hop nightclub) and I sometimes it's a reliable source, but most of time is just rumors and personal opinions and such and I tend not to use it, the only hip-hop only reliable source I use is Hip Hop Weekly and theres nothing in the article there, the only reliable source i see is the MTV source and that's the source mentioned in the article, one reliable source doesn't make the album notable. Secret ^account 22:10, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    • I just saw the duplicate article which should be history merged if kept, the only other reliable source I saw from that listing that just doesn't mention that the album exists is XXL and they mostly duplicate the MTV source. None of the others are reliable like DatPff and Brown Sista. Secret ^account 22:16, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment - Although some of the sources aren't the greatest, I feel at this point the album passes notability. Because of the way I haphazardly did this, I think that we can place a speedy delete on the article Ms. G.O.A.T, and either revote for Ms. G.O.A.T. (which I believe is unnecessary, but fair) or agree that it meets notability and close this discussion. Because I feel too biased by now, I do not want to place any tags without consensus, and would generally prefer if someone else did it. - Theornamentalist (talk) 21:04, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete None of the sources are reliable. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 21:50, 13 September 2010 (UTC) Keep, didn't see there were two articles. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 01:31, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong keep The newer version, Ms._G.O.A.T., easily has enough reliable sources - a write up by MTV, and coverage by XXL magazine, AllHipHop, and New York (magazine) - easily reliable enough sources and big enough focus on the mixtape. Crateescape101 (talk) 23:21, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Ms. G.O.A.T.. Notable artist, some significant coverage in reliable sources. Redirect Ms. G.O.A.T to that one.--Michig (talk) 05:34, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete and redirect to Ms. G.O.A.T.. Armbrust ^Talk _Contribs 11:10, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - mixtapes and unofficial releases are not notable. - eo (talk) 16:51, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.