The result was keep. The article was entirely rewritten to describe an apparently different topic beginning on August 18. The earlier comments are therefore inapplicable, and the (few) subsequent comments advocate keeping. That's without prejudice to a full AfD about the new topic. Sandstein 06:20, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Not a recognized psychiatric condition. This, like otherkin, is a fictional online trend popularized at sites like Tumblr. It literally did not exist a few years ago. Eastlaw talk ⁄ contribs 03:15, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
A far more common name in psychology would be Multiple Personality Disorder, but if you click on that, you get redirected to dissociative identity disorder. Wouldn't it be better to merge the content of this article to the other one, and to rename it as "Multiple Personality Disorder"? ACEOREVIVED (talk) 19:24, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Watch responses from these two places:
Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Science#Reference_Needed_for_Multiplicity_.28psychology.29
Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Psychology#Mutiplicity
-- RexRowan Talk 10:13, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]