The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep, WP:SNOW. Certainly no consensus for deletion. fish&karate 11:01, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Murder of Jo Cox[edit]

Murder of Jo Cox (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Death of Jo Cox (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is going to be controversial, but I don't believe Jo Cox's article length is sufficiently large enough to warrant a spinoff article, even though many improvements have been made in the last 18 hours or so. For an analogous article, compare and contrast with Death of John Lennon. Discuss. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 06:58, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. AusLondonder (talk) 07:09, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. AusLondonder (talk) 07:09, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. AusLondonder (talk) 07:09, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Which article would you like me to improve? Ironically enough, looking to improve the article (I put the lead blurb on ITN yesterday) is why I came here. I would rather work with people on one good article (not to be confused with a good article) than dilute my efforts over several. However I figure it's impossible to have a conversation like this right now. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 07:55, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Nominating for deletion is not generally seen as improving an article. AusLondonder (talk) 07:59, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Brandmeister: Little of the suspect is known and a trial will most likely occur. Please help improve it from the current state. AusLondonder (talk) 07:29, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Likely, but now it's too soon. If enough info becomes available for a standalone article and/or the main article becomes too large, then yes, I think. Brandmeistertalk 07:33, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 09:16, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Richhoncho Trim it now. Don't try and do it when less people will object. AusLondonder (talk) 10:38, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
AusLondonder, I suggested a merge and gave a view, it is highly unlikely I will ever edit the Jo Cox article or anything to do with her death. Is that alright with you? --Richhoncho (talk) 10:59, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.