The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedily deleted under criterion G11. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 04:29, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Musketeer Chess (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG Kleuske (talk) 21:58, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 04:42, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. No evidence of notability at all. A game made up by someone and posted to a web site and it has also been listed on a couple of other web sites, one of which says "This site seeks to catalog the vast number of Chess variants created throughout history, as well as to nurture the creation of new variants", in other words it is totally indiscriminate, and lists any variant, no matter how notable or non-notable. I can find no evidence that it has received any significant attention anywhere. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 16:28, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete -- an unreferenced essay and WP:PROMO. The article is being edited by Special:Contributions/Musketeerchess2016 so COI editing is about 99% certain. The editor in question persists in deleting the AfD template: diff. I requested speedy deletion. K.e.coffman (talk) 22:49, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 22:50, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 22:50, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.