The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete as non-notable. —Sean Whitton / 11:13, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

MySNC Records

[edit]

Doesn't seem to be notable, and a previous speedy deletion noted this. The main contributor is JamieGilder, possibly the same person as the founder (Jamie Gilder). Ian¹³ /t 12:19, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

References and other citations will be put on in due course. I understand the face that it is me inserting all this information.

But soon, songs will be released in the UK which will appear within the UK Singles Charts. MySNC Records is hardly anywhere to be found on the internet, and when searched, it's Unprofessional MySpace page appears. JamieGilder (talk) 14:50, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly. Wikipedia isn't a place for advertising or a companies website, it is an encyclopedia. Neither is it a crystal ball - if the records company gets lots of signings, and hits on the singles chart, I doubt it's notability would be contested. But as it stands, there is little to make it notable. If there is little on the internet, it's probably because it isn't that important presently. Additionally, Original Research is banned. Ian¹³ /t 15:40, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
What Original Research is currently on the page? - I really don't understand why this is being contested. —Preceding unsigned comment added by JamieGilder (talk • contribs) 17:56, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Well, one can assume any facts added by yourself without references are likely to be from your own knowledge. Ian¹³ /t 18:04, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 20:47, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, article fails to establish notability as per WP:CORP. Blatant WP:ADVERT & WP:COI Esradekan Gibb ^"Talk" 21:49, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Scientizzle 16:02, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Although WP:COI isn't a reason for deletion non-notability and non-verifiability (of notability) are. Perhaps reasonable to work on in userspace (but, not include the links per say) so that if it becomes notable in a reasonably short length of time the article can be recreated. Otherwise, build it in Word (or other offwiki text program) and save it until the company does become notable. Jasynnash2 (talk) 16:13, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.