- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 04:20, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
NGA Human Resources[edit]
- NGA Human Resources (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article is little more than blatant advertising, and has survived CSD on the grounds of the creator improving it. Company could well be notable but as it stands would have to be totally rewritten to be encyclopaedic. Triptothecottage (talk) 07:48, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 04:39, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 04:39, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:27, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:27, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as corporate spam, likely COI driven. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:15, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 07:36, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.