The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. A redirect can be created if necessary. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 19:47, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nadine Milroy-Sloan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

This is a violation of Wp:BLP1E - in 2001, she accused Neil Hamilton (politician) (along with his wife and a friend) of rape (they were found innocent). She was then sent to prison for three years for attempting to pervert the course of justice. I don't think this makes someone notable, and there's nothing in this article - apart from a trivial statement saying that she was previously charged with ABH - that isn't covered in the accused's article. DitzyNizzy (aka Jess)|(talk to me)|(What I've done) 13:08, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Agree with proposer. --Holkingers (talk) 13:38, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete sounds like a fascinating individual but WP:ONEVENT. She deserves a place in a criminal database but not here. Drawn Some (talk) 14:03, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Neil Hamilton (politician)#After the scandal as it fails WP:BLP1E but is a likely search term. Dpmuk (talk) 14:06, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect per Dpmuk - might be searched for but doesn't need an article. JohnCD (talk) 21:40, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect all pertinent info to the Neil Hamilton and Christine Hamilton pages to keep the facts about her criminal activities and conviction clearly in the public domain. Rms125a@hotmail.com (talk) 22:54, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect - WP:BLP1E. —Snigbrook 23:26, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:00, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 12:04, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. She is already named in the Hamiltons' articles, which is sufficient. I'd like her to have the chance to put this behind her, return to anonymity, and not be defined as a person for this incident. I got the impression she was not well at the time.qp10qp (talk) 15:51, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:BLP1E and also remove the subject's name from the articles where it is mentioned, per the general spirit of WP:BLP. The incident is worth mentioning in the articles about those people (sorry, but I hold them in such contempt that I can't bring myself to write their names), but this subject's name doesn't add anything to our understanding of them. Phil Bridger (talk) 22:08, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.