The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The opinions of new editors and IP !voters are discounted due to their likely unfamiliarity with the criteria for inclusion. Outside of those, consensus is clear that this subject does not yet meet those criteria. bd2412 T 03:40, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes. However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: ((subst:spa|username)); suspected canvassed users: ((subst:canvassed|username)); accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: ((subst:csm|username)) or ((subst:csp|username)).

Nana Kwame Wiafe (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Dubious notability , over-emphasis on personal life and political ambitions, possibly promotional DGG ( talk ) 05:31, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - Nana Kwame Wiafe is a well-known Ghanaian household name. From the article's references, you can tell of his notability. I do not get why the word 'Dubious' as used by DGG makes the article unfit for Wikipedia. There are several references from Google News to satisfy our doubts. An example of a dubious notable person from Ghana is this Geezygee (talk) 07:06, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - He is a well known Entrepreneur, it is quite unfortunate the Ghanaian media writes more on his wealth either than his works. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 154.160.11.9 (talk) 07:08, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - This person is a reputable person in the Ghanaian community. See https://www.google.com/search?q=Nana+Kwame+Wiafe&rlz=1C1CHWL_enGH822GH822&oq=nana+Kwame+Wiafe&aqs=chrome.0.69i59j0j69i59j69i60l3.2120j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8
• Keep - The article is well sourced. Coming from Africa where news comes more often in papers, I believe the article is notable enough to be kept — Preceding unsigned comment added by 154.160.10.73 (talk) 15:39, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep : The person in particularly mostly referred to as Nana Wan is a popular figure in Ghana. Consider keeping this article.102.176.94.62 (talk) 00:39, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. feminist (talk) 07:22, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ghana-related deletion discussions. feminist (talk) 07:23, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment multiple IP voters who have found their way here with their first or second edit. Advise relisting Nosebagbear (talk) 09:02, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete This article smacks of WP:PROMOTIONAL I do not see a notable person Wm335td (talk) 20:44, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - refer to https://g.co/kgs/xqJcQN — Preceding unsigned comment added by Geezygee (talk • contribs) 11:30, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete He seems like some quasi-celebrity, probably a social influencer; Coverage doesn't seem to be in depth and appears of shallow quality. He may become notable if he is elected to office in the 2024 election; But wikipedia is not a crystal ball for predicting someone's success. 💵Money💵emoji💵^{Talk💸Help out at CCI!} 14:49, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep : The person here is Nana Wan, a popular businessman in Ghana with well established businesses in Ghana. He was recently interviewed on a big radio station concerning him running for MP in the coming elections. Consider keeping this article.AlikotoSam (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 11:21, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment - several of the above "keep" votes have been made by single purpose accounts that have never edited before. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 14:34, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as self promotional. Lacks in-depth coverage. Fails WP:SIGCOV. Note to closer, possibly WP:SOCK or WP:CANVAS may be at work here.4meter4 (talk) 20:07, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.