The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. postdlf (talk) 22:20, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Narayan Sai

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems to have notoriety rather than notability. The article appears to be part of a WP:SOAPBOX over the incident of the death of two boys (see the only current reference) There are BLP issues here. There is currently a discussion here over the matter (which will be archived in due course). Fiddle Faddle 16:35, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 20:37, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 20:37, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 20:37, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 20:37, 2 September 2013 (UTC) Note: Please consider reading WP:INDAFD which includes some points about WikiProject India AFDs. Those may or may not be applicable here. Tito☸Dutta 20:44, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep We don't discriminate against notorious people. Topic has tons of sources. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8] .. they keep going if needed. These are mostly articles from the past couple weeks. If pressed it wouldn't be hard to find tons of coverage. It seems like the nom might be concerned the article was created in bad faith, but I'm not seeing soapbox with so much press coverage that supports notability. It might be possible to argue a merge to Asaram Bapu if the only notoriety of the son is in connection to the father's criminal case. But the press seems concerned with him for more than that, reporting on his helicopter crash and other things. -- Green Cardamom (talk) 04:51, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 16:54, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 03:34, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:50, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:50, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - user Green Cardamon is right. also GNG should cover it.--BabbaQ (talk) 15:27, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.