The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was rdelete. Steve Smith (talk) 08:24, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

National APIA Panhellenic Association (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Apparently not notable by our new and more stringent standards for organisations (and probably not by the old ones either). Three passing mentions on GNews, nothing in GNews archive, nothing on JSTOR. There are a number of passing mentions in books, but I don't see anything resembling in-depth coverage; the only mention in this book about diversity in sororities/fraternities is apparently attribution for some "advance praise" in the back-cover blurb. A redirect may be a viable alternative to deletion. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:50, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fraternities and sororities-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 12:10, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak Delete Seems like a legit organization, but there are absolutely no references to support anything. Perhaps with proper references, it can be kept. Peter303x (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 16:37, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.