The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Ngong Ping 360. (non-admin closure) — Alpha3031 (t • c) 04:10, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nei Lak Shan Angle Station

[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

As I understand it, these "angle stations" are just a part of the infrastructure of the Ngong Ping 360 gondola, and aren't really "stations" because passengers cannot normally board or alight. They probably fail the GNG since much of the news coverage which mentions them is about the gondola's operational issues. There is basically nothing to merge. Jc86035 (talk) 17:53, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I created the stubs here at English Wikipedia because of the Chinese Wikipedia articles: zh:彌勒山轉向站 (Nei Lak Shan Angle Station) and zh:機場島轉向站 (Airport Island Angle Station). ---Another Believer _(Talk) 18:01, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Another Believer: Personally, I think the Chinese Wikipedia has too many articles about Hong Kong and probably not enough articles about everything else. Almost every bus route in Hong Kong gets its own article, as do about one thousand streets and roads, even though most of their articles would be deleted on sight on the English Wikipedia for not establishing notability. Jc86035 (talk) 18:39, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:17, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:17, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect this and Airport Island Angle Station to Ngong Ping 360. I don't think there's enough notability for either angle station to have a standalone article, but they are prominent features on the cable car line and are therefore rightly described in the Ngong Ping 360 article. Redirecting will allow the keyword to be indexed and the reader brought to a page with more context about these angle stations. Deryck C. 13:48, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- I've not really completed a notability assessment, but I agree with redirecting over deleting. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 14:18, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Per WP:ATD and WP:R these pages should not be deleted because they could be redirected to Ngong Ping 360, the line of which these stations form part. No comment on notability at this time. James500 (talk) 19:30, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Vanamonde (talk) 12:57, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect Not notable by itself, but a list of stations would still be useful. Nova Crystallis (Talk) 16:15, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect as explained above. The content in the article is already present in Ngong Ping 360.--DreamLinker (talk) 19:02, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.