The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Michig (talk) 07:58, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

New America Media (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nomination completed by Reyk YO! on behalf of an IP editor:

My rationale is that it does not meet WP:ORG.- 71.128.35.13 (talk

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Rcsprinter123 (negotiate) @ 18:31, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Rcsprinter123 (push) @ 18:31, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:34, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 23:19, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Pacific News Service. Not enough RS clout; article comprised of OR puffery. Pax 23:46, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA1000 01:45, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.