The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Killiondude (talk) 06:44, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nordic Nanovector[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Apparently the product of undisclosed paid editing. Marginally notable -- sources are interviews, press releases, listings, etc -- and under promotional pressure. IP account spamming the website for this organization de-PRODed, so here we are. Definitely TOOSOON, especially with the promotional editing. Jytdog (talk) 05:45, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Jytdog (talk) 05:48, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Strong accusations without proof. Revert of proposed deletion can be done by anyone. Anonymous user is the spirit of Wikipedia and should not be discriminated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.164.170.101 (talk) 07:14, 19 January 2018 (UTC) — 85.164.170.101 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

IPs spamming their website include:

2001:4642:B111:0:4C1F:3811:CF4E:57E0 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

2001:4642:B111:0:F0B1:95F5:1463:51B (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

2001:4642:B111:0:DD0:A912:3CC:8566 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

2001:4642:B111:0:A019:35C7:1B2F:3B20 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

-- Jytdog (talk) 07:20, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I might shed some lights that those edits above are made by the same user. However, they are fix broken links. Then Jytdog starts removing stuff. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:4642:B111:0:DD0:A912:3CC:8566 (talk) 07:46, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No substantive independent coverage is cited. Spamming is the icing on the cake. Guy (Help!) 08:15, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- does not meet WP:NCORP / WP:CORPDEPTH and generally WP:TOOSOON. A whiff of promotionlism as well, so a "delete" all around. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:09, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.