The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Bongwarrior (talk) 01:11, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Normandy national football team (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Contested PROD, article about a team representing the French region of Normandy that played only a friendly match in 1921. Clearly fails WP:N, due to the evident lack of coverage about the subject, so I think it's not worth to stay here. Have your say. Angelo (talk) 22:52, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of football (soccer) related deletions. Angelo (talk) 22:54, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete One friendly game in 1921 against Brittany seems to suggest the team was formed more for an informal kick-about rather than to be a serious attempt at a "national team." Nothing to indicate any further activities since then or to suggest that the one game they did play was in any way notable. Tx17777 (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 22:58, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I can't see any reason to keep an article on a team that has played only one game, and a game that has no notability itself. Peanut4 (talk) 23:08, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. ArtVandelay13 (talk) 23:14, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - clearly not notable. (ESkog)^(Talk) 23:15, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom.--h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 23:23, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per Tx17777. пﮟოьεԻ 57 00:04, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per all above. Hardly even any context in here... Master of Puppets ^{Call me MoP!} 00:15, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per Tx and nominator. Malinaccier (talk) 00:16, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: per Tx and nom. Mh29255 (talk) 06:22, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Would be more interesting and credible if a match report was written, but none attempted  ClaretCarlyleClaretCarlyleContributions/ClaretCarlyle 
• Delete clearly nn, and unverifiable Mayalld (talk) 16:33, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.