The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:52, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nottingham Alien Noise[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:N and WP:NOTNEWS. Comatmebro (talk) 21:17, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This is tabloid-ish news. —cnzx 23:26, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! ^{Babymissfortune} 02:31, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! ^{Babymissfortune} 02:31, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! ^{Babymissfortune} 02:31, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete An objective article would require multiple WP:RS rather than just a few WP:SENSATIONal ones. - LuckyLouie (talk) 03:43, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No mention in larger papers like The Guardian. Per WP:NOTNEWS, unlikely to have enduring notability. —Paleo Neonate – 04:12, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No evidence of notability. Dunarc (talk) 18:40, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.