The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ad Orientem (talk) 04:28, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes. However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: ((subst:spa|username)); suspected canvassed users: ((subst:canvassed|username)); accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: ((subst:csm|username)) or ((subst:csp|username)).

Onuh Justus Izuchukwu (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable author. Not nearly enough in-depth coverage to meet wp:gng. Be aware that the Google scholar at first glance looks to merit him passing wp:nscholar. But those hits are for a different person of similar name (the first entry with 1322 cites was published the year this individual was born). So fails WP:NSCHOLAR, and nowhere near meets WP:NAUTHOR. Was declined at AfC, and then moved directly to the mainspace. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 20:11, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. TMG^talk 20:18, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. TMG^talk 20:18, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. TMG^talk 20:18, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. TMG^talk 20:18, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment. Umekaodo removed both the AfD notice from the article and most of the content from this discussion page. I have warned them not to do that. The same article appears to be duplicated at Izunwaonu, which has an interesting history. If this AfD is closed as delete, the other one should go as well. —David Eppstein (talk) 22:19, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete unless reliable sources can be found. I was not impressed by the alleged GS profile [1] Xxanthippe (talk) 22:35, 23 June 2018 (UTC).[reply]
• Comment. Both Izunwaonu and Onuh Justus Izuchukwu is the same person. I advice, do not delete. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chinenyeugwu (talk • contribs) 05:02, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Onuh Justus Izuchukwu also known as Izunwaonu is a Nigerian Public figure. Many of his works are not published online. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chinenyeugwu (talk • contribs) 05:10, 24 June 2018 (UTC) — Chinenyeugwu (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

• Delete With extreme prejudice - the AfC decline was correct. Self promotional autobiography with nothing to support it.PRehse (talk) 07:06, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Do not Delete, it is open for people to edit With extreme prejudice - the AfC decline was correct but with time, people will upgrade and supply a reliable sources. It is not a Self promotional autobiography rather, this is what people say about him. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Swaat (talk • contribs) 08:20, 25 June 2018 (UTC) — Swaat (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
• Do not Delete, it is open for people to edit on the process of providing more reliable sources for Onuh Justus IzuchukwuSwaat (talk) 20:27, 25 June 2018 (UTC)striking duplicate vote! Onel5969 ^{TT me} 21:21, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. After removing sources that do not mention the subject there is nothing left. The linked Google Scholar profile is larded with publications not by the subject, so clearly unreliable, but even if it were reliable it wouldn't demonstrate a pass of WP:PROF. We also don't have a pass of any other notability guideline. And the editing history of the two copies of this article appear to both be heavily promotional and in violation of our policies on use of multiple accounts. —David Eppstein (talk) 22:02, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete does not meet WP:GNG, WP:ANYBIO, or WP:AUTHOR. Jmertel23 (talk) 19:48, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.