The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 03:18, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Open Blog (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

There are currently no references for this article, and I cannot find any either. The only sources available are self-published. Google search of "Open Blog" only produced false positives, so I also tried Tomaž Muraus, the developers name. Any decent review of the product should mention the main developer, but I cannot find any. The article has not been the subject of multiple, independent works in reliable sources. Fails WP:N and WP:V. Atmoz (talk) 16:31, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: The sole contributor to the article is a WP:SPA, User:KamiSLO. A user of the same name created the Open Blog page on Digg, leaving a clear sense that the Wiki article is an element of some marketing strategy; as such, this fails WP:PROMOTION. No independent sources are cited and, based on a Google search, none are available online, so this fails WP:V. Same search doesn't support notability. —Preceding unsigned comment added by James R. Ward (talk • contribs) 07:46, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

---

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Valley2city^‽ 15:42, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

---

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | ^Talk 03:14, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Without additional coverage in independent 3rd party sources, this does not meet notability guidelines. --OliverTwisted ^(Talk) (Stuff) 03:18, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom.Inmysolitude (talk) 03:24, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.