The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 00:03, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Opm (restaurant)

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable restaurant, advertising. I had originally put a db-ad tag on the article, but it's been here for almost a year. No reliable sources in the article, and I could find none in Google search (though admittedly looking for just "opm" is difficult). Only one hit in Google news. Corvus cornix_talk 02:38, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete The articles only claim to notability is being designed by a particular architect who is non-notable. The age of the article really shouldn't make a difference. Clovis Sangrail (talk) 02:49, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 03:57, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 03:57, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I also did a little searching, and while there are many listing-type mentions in food sites, I couldn't find anything to denote notability of the restaurant. Closest was a case study from the firm that did some work with the restaurant. Eclipsed (t) 12:29, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I agree that this article fails WP:N. Geoff ^{Who, me?} 23:12, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.