The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep - nomination withdrawn with no delete votes (non-admin closure). Whpq (talk) 18:32, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oruvan (1999 film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable film, nothing found in a WP:BEFORE to help this pass WP:NFILM. Previous PROD resulted in deletion, but recreated after "prod challenged by Neutral Fan at WP:REFUND" Donaldd23 (talk) 09:18, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Donaldd23 (talk) 09:18, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Donaldd23 (talk) 09:18, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy keep - article now includes better sources. In fact, the WP:REFUND request itself had the sources which the nominators missed in their deletion of this article. Casually calling it a "non notable" film is questionable, when looking at the high-profile cast and crew of the project. Neutral Fan (talk) 16:20, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak keep as the article has been improved with extra content sourced to additional reliable sources. A weak keep because the reviews are on the short side, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 00:53, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep notable and sourced. Shahid • ^Talk2me 13:18, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: Expanded well enough, with at least two reliable reviews. Kailash29792 (talk) 15:52, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep The cited reviews are sufficient to meet NFILM. -- Ab207 (talk) 14:49, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Nomination withdrawn per WP:HEY. Thanks everyone. Donaldd23 (talk) 17:35, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.