The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Joe (talk) 16:06, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oswald K. Azumah[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

Oswald K. Azumah (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet criteria of WP:GNG or WP:BIO. I am unable to find multiple reliable sources that discuss him significantly. Google search for "Oswald Azumah" or "Oswald K. Azumah" results in fewer than 100 listings, mainly of things he's written. Contested prod. ... discospinster talk 17:13, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Hhkohh (talk) 14:20, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Hhkohh (talk) 14:20, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ghana-related deletion discussions. Hhkohh (talk) 14:20, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

*Don't Delete The article meets credibility requirements. Ugfile.com and Myjoyonline.com are credibles news portals and they are both cited. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SaintOhrszy (talk • contribs) 14:33, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Vote removed for confirmed sockpuppetry Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SaintOhrszy. Hzh (talk) 20:10, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hi SaintOhrszy, it's worth having a look at this AfD Outcomes - "don't delete" could strictly mean anything other than delete, though reading your comment I assume you mean "Keep". Nosebagbear (talk) 10:56, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 08:57, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Vote removed for confirmed sockpuppetry Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SaintOhrszy. Hzh (talk) 20:10, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: KilaBeing should be warned for removing other people's vote. His or her first edit is also to vote on this, which is curious. Even more curiously SaintOhrszy also tried to delete another user's vote, and they both used the same edit summary. Hzh (talk) 11:42, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
It is really not curious. SaintOhrszy created the article and says "don't delete", and KilaBeing is a friend or colleague, who is not above using subterfuge to try and subvert the discussion. He will now try to demonstrate how unjust Wikipedia is by copying my comment above word by word to nominate Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bernard Avle even though Bernard Avle is considerably more notable and my comment doesn't fit once plagiarised and out of context. — Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 11:56, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
A sockpuppetry report has been filed. If confirmed, then his or her vote here can be struck off, and the AfD for Bernard Avle can be closed. Hzh (talk) 12:40, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. — Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 12:43, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Hzh: looks like your judgement was correct, both accounts have been blocked now. — Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 18:12, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I've struck through their votes for sockpuppetry. Hzh (talk) 20:10, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
More