The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:18, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Our Miracle (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article has failed to satisfy WP:BK and the more general WP:GNG by showing any significant coverage in reliable, third-party sources. Of the sources in the article, 4 are from a retailer, 2 are primary sources from the publisher, and the last one looks to be from a blog. A cursory Google search reveals nothing in the way of reliable sources. 十八 23:11, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. 十八 23:11, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. 十八 04:30, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Non notable work by a non notable manga author (Natsuo Kumeta is a self-redirect to Our Miracle) - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 17:44, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep – Not non-notable as many other works on Wikipedia. --Article editor (talk) 00:15, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Please see WP:OTHERSTUFF.--十八 00:28, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete non-notable per the current sources, searching found an additional one paragraph plot summary at mangafox.me, still not notable. Gab4gab (talk) 18:33, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete While it appears on MADB, there are no notable ANN reviews. [1] Online sources point to scanlation sites, blog reviews. Nothing to show best-selling rankings. Mentioned briefly on ANN but neither it nor the author have an entry there. [2] AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 20:23, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as there's nothing convincingly better for independent notability. SwisterTwister talk 22:40, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.