The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Mark Arsten (talk) 13:55, 17 September 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Palestinian general election, 2012[edit]

Palestinian general election, 2012 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A hypothetical future event, which has no date. Actually, this article was created back in 2011 and renamed to 2012 because no elections took place. Per WP policy, it should not have a page until the actual event takes place. There is no date set as well, so it remains a hypothetical event.Greyshark09 (talk) 20:27, 11 September 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Keep but rename "Next Palestinian general election" as there is no date set. There is no Wikipedia policy that says we can't have articles on future events that are expected to happen and on which there is media coverage, hence why we have things like Next United Kingdom general election (for which there is also no date set). Number 57 08:09, 12 September 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • And please stop removing this and Palestinian local elections, 2012 (for which there is a date set) from ((Palestinian elections)). Number 57 08:10, 12 September 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]
• Keep If there's sufficient media coverage to pass WP:N, there can be an article about a future event — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 17:43, 12 September 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Palestine-related deletion discussions. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 17:47, 12 September 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:07, 13 September 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

• Keep Same reason for keeping local elections. Delays are no reason to delete the article. They are clearly being planned as evidenced by voter registration, CEC preparations and official govt. announcements. As editors we are not in the business of speculating on whether or not elections occur because of current instability. We can just update the article with RS on the matter of postponement (and the reasons behind it i.e. ongoing unity talks, factional tensions, mass protests against govt., etc.) --Al Ameer son (talk) 16:13, 16 September 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.