The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep. From what the article says, the housing development sounds big enough and troubled enough to be notable. Perhaps one or more contributors to the Indianapolis article could be asked to find reliable sources and to rewrite and expand the article. --02:32, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
Keep. It needs sourcing, but the housing complex isn't non-notable. The author may have failed to fully explain the importance of the project. Jgassens19:31, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.