The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:39, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Paul R. Fleischman

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Current sourcing is almost all primary. Searches turned up virtually nothing. Certainly not enough in-depth coverage to show he passes WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:21, 4 August 2017 (UTC) Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:21, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:03, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:03, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:04, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - the award he got was minor, and none of the other information is verifiable. Bearian (talk) 13:35, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No more notable than many, many other authors. Searching Google news didn't throw up much apart from the odd reference to his books. To be expected from any academic or author. Famous _dog (c) 09:14, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.