The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Even disregarding throwaway !votes, strong consensus to keep. If someone strongly disagrees, feel free to revert the close. (non-admin closure) Regards, MacMedtalkstalk 23:22, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Periphery (band)[edit]

Periphery (band) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:MUSIC; a following on the internet produces a lot of ghits, which tends to obscure how thin the coverage really is. For our purposes a relatively successful myspace band. Discussed last year without consensus. - Simon Dodd { U·T·C·WP:LAW } 13:52, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

^^^ you suck —Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.177.239.5 (talk) 19:04, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

They are featured in the current issue of Guitar World: see [1] That's notable enough. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 143.215.144.191 (talk) 20:20, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Just to be clear, if there were another magazine like Guitar World that had featured them, would that be enough, or are you suggesting that the notability of the magazine is questionable? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.242.75.160 (talk) 01:18, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:10, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.