The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:05, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Peter P. Gudo[edit]

Peter P. Gudo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Was deleted per a deletion discussion in 2013, then G4ed several months later, and then recreated yet again. I should have tagged it back then per G4 but foolishly tagged it per G11. For more, see WP:BLPN#Peter Gudo. Bbb23 (talk) 16:33, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- I've checked what's available via the links above and it falls well short of what would be required to establish notability per any standard. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 16:38, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. G11 wasn't a bad rationale--it has been a promotional piece, and notability has never been established. Perhaps sometime down the road, but now it's WP:TOOSOON. 2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 17:34, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. clpo13(talk) 07:04, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. clpo13(talk) 07:04, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. clpo13(talk) 07:04, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.