The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Beeblebrox (talk) 20:33, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

PhpPennyAuction[edit]

PhpPennyAuction (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable script. I can't find any mention in google books / news. (disputed PROD) SmartSE (talk) 22:01, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - the software script has been in the news here quite a bit, eg: http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/technology-science/technology/watchdog-probes-penny-auction-software-104359. Highly notable. 81.135.36.195 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 11:59, 24 March 2012 (UTC). — 81.135.36.195 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
Such a brief mention in a tabloid paper isn't sufficient. (I removed ref tags around the link given by the IP) SmartSE (talk) 20:23, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 19:45, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep News articles warrant accountability, this article should be improved to highlight the legal issues. 87.112.93.175 (talk) 23:11, 24 March 2012 (UTC) — 87.112.93.175 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.