The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. T. Canens (talk) 13:32, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pickupp[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is likely the product of undeclared paid editing. It was recently created, using promotional language, by the SPA Shermainetjm (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Also, somebody complained to OTRS that the HTML source code has "no follow" settings (as is normal for new unpatrolled articles). The only conceivable motivation for such a complaint is that whoever wrote the article is now angry that it does not fulfil its promotional purposes. On the merits, this looks like a WP:MILL company with nothing more than routine coverage. Sandstein 09:20, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Shermainetjm has confirmed that they work for this company. Sandstein 09:52, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Completely fails WP:NCORP and built based on utterly unreliable PR sources apart from the apparent promotion attempts. The second PR source currently in the article was written by this Pickupp company itself as the byline correctly stated. – Ammarpad (talk) 09:40, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:40, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:41, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as paid-for spam about a unremarkable startup. MER-C 11:03, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete an article being used for promotional purposes about a company which does not have sourcing which meets WP:NCORP. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 12:56, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above - no WP:CORPDEPTH sourcing in the article or elsewhere that I could find. GirthSummit _(blether) 17:04, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per above, and that there is no reliable source online beyond routine coverage for this to meet WP:GNG. Tosi | he/him | ^t/_c 18:54, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Does not pass NCORP. Natureium (talk) 14:04, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unreliable sources and fails WP:NCORP--SalmanZ (talk) 22:11, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Company is notable as a listed company in Techinasia and funded by established companies such as Alibaba Entrepreneurship Fund

Please take a look at WP:NCORP to learn more about how we establish notability in companies. Inclusion in lists, and sources of funding, are not factors we consider. GirthSummit _(blether) 08:09, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete References fail to establish notability, topic fails NCORP and GNG. HighKing⁺⁺ 16:49, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.