The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to United States Pirate Party. PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 04:26, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pirate Party of Oklahoma (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am requesting a Redirect to United States Pirate Party on the grounds that this state chapter of the Pirate Party is non-notable. It has no official recognition in the state of Oklahoma, has never run a candidate for office, and has received no substantial news coverage. MelanieN (talk) 23:10, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The reason I am bringing this redirect request to AfD is that I previously suggested a redirect on the article's talk page, but the suggestion was contested. --MelanieN (talk) 23:15, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I see from the author's talk page that a previous article, Pirate party of oklahoma (note the slightly different capitalization), was speedy-deleted in August 2010. Apparently it was promptly recreated by the same author. --MelanieN (talk) 23:23, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Question Do you have any independent, reliable sources to support any of this information? All I can find to indicate current activity is the websites of the parties. The state organization's website was last updated in December 2010. The national party's website was last updated in January 2011. Neither seems to be very active. A Google News search finds recent news about Pirate Parties in other countries, but not the US. The state organization still claims affiliation with the national party. [1] --MelanieN (talk) 04:58, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.