The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:20, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Playrix[edit]

AfDs for this article:

(Find video game sources: "Playrix" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk)

Unreliable references. No indication of notability. Township seems to be the only notable game there, and that already has an article. Anarchyte (work | talk) 02:16, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Anarchyte (work | talk) 02:17, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Anarchyte (work | talk) 02:17, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as certainly questionably notable as there is not enough convincing in-depth third-party sources overall. SwisterTwister talk 05:24, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting because the previous AFD was not visible up until now SpinningSpark 18:33, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SpinningSpark 18:33, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti ^Talk 19:19, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as a non-notable video game developer failing WP:GNG with no reliable independent in-depth sources, such as WP:VG/RS. Does not meet WP:NCORP and having developer notable video games is WP:NOTINHERITED. AdColony entry doesn't appear reliable and like PR. There's an interview, but it's mainly primary content. Other stuff looks like PR mainly, like [1][2] or all those game press releases. No hits in Russian print magazines. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 23:13, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.